Follow this page: RSS

Recent Publications

Schreiber, N., *Carol, R.N., *Evans, J.E., *Pimentel, P., Nichols-Lopez, K., Holness, H., Rose, S., & Furton, K. (in press). Witness memory and alcohol. The effects of state-dependent recall. Law and Human Behavior.

Charman, S. D., & Quiroz, V. (in press). Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those identifications. Law and Human Behavior.

Charman, S. D., Reyes, A., Villalba, D., & Evans, J. (in press). The (un)reliability of alibi corroborators: Failure to recognize faces of briefly-encountered strangers puts innocent suspects at risk. Behavioral Sciences and the Law.

Leins, D., & Charman, S. D. (2016). Schema reliance and innocent alibi generation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21, 111-126. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12035

Rivard, J., Pena, M. & Schreiber Compo (in press). ‘Blind’ interviewing: Is ignorance bliss? Memory.

Hirn Mueller, D., Schreiber Compo, N., Molina, J., Bryon, A. & Pimentel, P. (2015). Best practice and problematic investigative interviewing techniques: Do police interviewers know the difference? Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 21, 295–308.

Charman, S. D., Carbone, J., Kekesie, S., & Villalba, D. (in press). Evidence evaluation and evidence integration in legal decision-making: Order of evidence presentation as a moderator of context effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology. doi: 10.1002/acp.3181

Vallano, J.P., Evans, J.R., Kieckhaefer, J.M., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2015). Rapport-building during witness and suspect interviews: A survey of law enforcement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 369-380. doi: 10.1002/acp.3115

Hirn Mueller, D., Schreiber Compo, N., Molina, J., Byron, A., & Pimentel, P. (in press). Productive and counter-productive interviewing techniques: Do law enforcement investigators know the difference? Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law.

Vallano, J.P. & Schreiber Compo, N. (in press). Rapport-building with cooperative witnesses and criminal suspects: A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law.